A bunch of useless crap
Published on June 11, 2005 By MasonM In Misc
This information is taken from various sources including state laws, state driver's handbooks, and bicycle safety advocacy sites.

A bicycle is a vehicle. Any person riding a bicycle has all of the same rights and responsibilities as a driver of any other vehicle.

In most states, bicycles are required to ride as far to the right of the roadway as is safely possible. There are however certain conditions which allow bicycles to use the main part of the roadway.

FOLLOWING A CYCLIST

As you approach a cyclist, slow down. Avoid the use of your horn. Cyclists can usually hear an approaching vehicle and loud noises can surprise the bicycle operator, causing an accident. Do not follow closely. Bicycles can stop and maneuver quickly. Be prepared for a cyclist to swerve to avoid a road hazard. Young cyclists are particularly likely to make surprising changes in direction.

PASSING A CYCLIST

When passing a cyclist, wait until its safe, allow adequate clearance (usually about three feet) and return to your lane when you can clearly see the cyclist in your rearview mirror. Do not use you horn. Do not attempt to share the lane with the cyclist. Reduce your speed, follow the bicycle and wait for a safe opportunity to pass. Aerodynamic effects from winds off large vehicles can cause a bicycle to be suddenly pulled toward the larger vehicle by two or three feet, depending on the relative speed between the two vehicles.

RIGHT AND LEFT TURNS

A bicycle is not restricted to the right side of the road. Cyclists are required to use the turn lanes. Merge safely with bicycle traffic when turning. Do not make right turns across the path of bicycle traffic. It is common for an experienced cyclist to reach speeds of 20-30 m.p.h. and be closer than you think.

Bicycles are required to ride on paved shoulders, where they exist, or as far right in the lane as possible only when the lane can be safely shared by a car and a bicycle, side by side. Even then, there are certain conditions that allow a bicyclist to "take the travel lane," such as:

The bicycle is overtaking and passing another vehicle proceeding in the same direction
The bicycle is preparing for a left hand turn.
There are unsafe conditions in the roadway, such as fixed or moving objects, parked or moving vehicles, pedestrians, animals, potholes, debris or glass.
The lane is narrow in width making it unsafe for a motor vehicle and a bicycle to share the lane side by side.

Bicyclists are not restricted to the right lane of traffic. When the bicyclist is changing lanes to make a left turn, they are to follow the same path any other vehicle would take traveling the same direction.

When turning left at an intersection, yield to oncoming bicyclists just as you would yield to oncoming motorists. (You'd be surprised how many people fail to do this)

DO NOT blast your horn when approaching bicyclists -you could startle them, causing an accident. (And we really HATE that)

Look for bicyclists before opening your car door. (I've been "doored" a few times)

Expect the unexpected from children. Children on bicycles are often unpredictable in their actions. A common accident type for young cyclists is mid-block rideouts - entering the roadway from a driveway, alley, or curb without slowing, stopping or looking for traffic.

Look both ways at intersections before turning. Bicycles may be found riding incorrectly facing traffic and create special hazards at intersections. (This is a really stupid thing for a cyclist to do, but there are still a fair numer of people who think they are supposed to ride their bike "facing traffic". Not only is it illegal, but it increases the odds of a motorist coming from a side road or driveway to not see them.)

Be alert to the causes of the most common motorist/bicycle collisions. A motorist turning left will overlook or misjudge the speed of the oncoming bicycle traffic. When turning right, the motorist should slow and merge with the bicycle traffic for a safe right hand turn. Motorists failing to yield the right-of-way at a stop sign to a bicyclist is the third most common cause of collisions. At intersections, right-of-way rules apply equally to bicycles and motor vehicles.

And please, please don't throw things from your car at the cyclists! Not only is it illegal but you really could kill someone that way no matter how "funny" you may think it is.

Above all else, just show cyclists the same respect you show to other vehicles on the road. Umm, on second thought, maybe try and show us a little more respect. (I've seen how some drivers treat each other.)

Comments
on Jun 12, 2005
Firstly I should I agree with not using your horn on cyclist. I get bloody tempted to sometimes but I don't.

However I think in many cases, not all, bicycles shouldn't even be allowed on the road, unless they follow certain rules. I should point out I come from a city with lots of bicycle paths and there is no reason for them to share the road in many cases. Even so I think cyclists should remember this: when they ride on the roads they take their life in their own hands. Unless you are riding at the speed limit you should expect to get hit unless you get off the middle of the road.
A car will do a lot more damage to a bicycle than the bicycle will do to the car, so therefore the cyclists should be the ones who are careful. It takes more time and more energy for a car to slow down then it does for the bicycle. When the difference in speed is high it reduces your reaction time for stopping.

I think cyclists need to remember that they are the minority on the road and should not expect cars to patiently wait as you crawl along usually 40 kph below the speed limit (okay not always but in my experience mostly) especially on narrow roads. You also need to remember that as a car driver you mostly expect the other obstacles to be other motor vehicles. The driver is subject to a certain amount of inattentional blindness and may not see a bicycle simply because they are not looking for one ( Watch the video on selective looking at this site http://viscog.beckman.uiuc.edu/djs_lab/demos.html ). Inattentional blindness isn't the fault of the driver but simple a matter of the brain being designed to only look for one thing at once. It can look for more than one type of object but it is ineffcient at it.

I work on the top of a hill at an astronomical observatory. Down the bottom of the hill is a sign, what does the sign say? It says: "No bicycles" Do they pay attention? No. The reason it says no bicycles is because the road is narrow, windy and the has double lines all the way up. Now if you are trying to get to work and there is cyclist in front of you it takes an extra 10 minutes to get up the hill. The worst thing is that it isn't even the cyclists that are in the most danger, it is the cars because if they get frustrated and cross the double lines to pass them they are at risk of a head on collision (or going down the side of the hill). Yet we still get heaps of cyclist going up the hill.
Even worse, one day I saw a guy going up with a baby trailer hooked onto the back of his bike with his kid inside....hmm I wonder who would be the first to die if a car ran up the back of them. That's bloody Darwinism in action.

I think cyclists need to keep in mind just how frustrating it is to be stuck behind them. If you are on a wide road keep to the side. If you are on a narrow road, well frankly you shouldn't be because you are putting yourself and the driver at risk.
Don't me started on motorcyclist either, they had an ad campaign (in Australia) a while asking for more consideration from drivers when they go and do stupid things like weaving in and out of traffic.
If you can't tell, this is sort of a sore subject for me.
on Jun 12, 2005
Above all else, just show cyclists the same respect you show to other vehicles on the road. Umm, on second thought, maybe try and show us a little more respect. (I've seen how some drivers treat each other.)


altho i took a couple year hiatus (following a truly spectacular exhibition of 6-lane spanning bike gymnastics that prevented me from being able to use both sets of brakes for a lot longer than if id had decent health insurance), i'd been rackin up a lotta miles. i've recently been missing it again and i'm hoping to have a whole day free sometime next week to dissassemble, clean, repair, replace, lube and the entire machine before heading back into the fray.

altho i've only had a couple very minor encounters with cars (neither of which woulda happened if the other vehicle operators--and i'm being generous there--hadn't dismissed me as part of the backdrop or something), there are way too many people behind the wheel who clearly don't have a clue when it comes to cyclists.

thanks for helpin to educate em.
on Jun 12, 2005
Even so I think cyclists should remember this: when they ride on the roads they take their life in their own hands


riding on sidewalks--especially when there are alleys that open onto the street--is considerably more dangerous. no

A car will do a lot more damage to a bicycle than the bicycle will do to the car, so therefore the cyclists should be the ones who are careful. It takes more time and more energy for a car to slow down then it does for the bicycle. When the difference in speed is high it reduces your reaction time for stopping.


most cyclists are aware of their vulnerability. using that same logic, cars shouldnt have to yield to pedestrians nor powerboats to sailboats nor 18 wheelers to passenger vehicles.

If you are on a narrow road, well frankly you shouldn't be because you are putting yourself and the driver at risk.


while the guy with the baby trailer shoulda had it--and his kid--taken from him for everyone's safety, any road that's so narrow there's not room for cars and bikes is really too narrow for cars altogether and should be reserved solely for bikes
on Jun 12, 2005
Toblerone; You are exacly the type of person who shouldn't be allowed to operate a motor vehicle. To sum up your attitude "It's ok and expected to hit anyone who is moving slower".
Sorry, no.

Yes, bicycles do have rules to follow. They also have as much right, by law, to use the roadways as your motor vehicle. If a roadway is posted "no bicycles" then I agree cyclists shouldn't be there. In the interest of safety, have you spoken to a police officer about that problem? It could save someone being killed.

I agree with you that cyclists shoud indeed be careful and most of them are. But anyone operating a motor vehicle also has the responsibility of safety as well.

Your attitude is one that you do not want to share the road, and honestly that makes you and people like you a danger to others.

I'm sorry if this all seems a tad hardsh, but your kind of attitude is a public safety hazard.

there are way too many people behind the wheel who clearly don't have a clue when it comes to cyclists.


I agree. Between them and the agressive ones, it can be a real danger at times. So far I've been lucky and have only been run off the road once, and that was intentional by a group of teenagers, it could happen at any time. Luckily a cop saw them run me off the rode and stopped them. The teen that was driving lost his license until he turned 18.

I hope you can get back out there soon.
on Jun 12, 2005
Thursday, July 29, 2004

By ROBERT THARP / The Dallas Morning News

What started with yelling and hand gestures on a Sunday morning in May near White Rock Lake was quickly punctuated by the sound of crunching metal as car struck bicycle.

On Wednesday, a distinguished law professor was indicted, accused of using her Volkswagen Passat as a deadly weapon in what police and cycling advocates describe as an extreme case of road rage.

Jane Dolkart, 56, was charged with aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. If convicted, she faces two to 20 years in prison and a fine of up to $10,000. Southern Methodist University officials said Ms. Dolkart remains on the law school faculty while the case is under review, but she is not teaching classes this summer.

According to police reports and court files, tensions escalated quickly as cyclist Tommy Thomas and a friend were riding single-file on West Lawther Drive south of Mockingbird Lane about 10 a.m. on May 2.

The two men told police that a motorist in a green Passat started following them closely, honking the car's horn, yelling and gesturing "in an unfriendly manner," according to police reports.

"I said, 'Wow, this is not right, this person has got some anger here,' " said Paul Schoenberg, who was riding with Mr. Thomas. "Obviously she was in a hurry ... she was right on us."

Moments later, a witness described hearing a scream, followed by the vehicle accelerating and then the sound of "an awful crunching noise and brakes screeching," according to court records.

His shoes still clipped to his bicycle pedals, Mr. Thomas was dragged under the car. When the car stopped, Ms. Dolkart commented as Mr. Thomas called 911: "Oh please, I didn't even hit you. ... you were in the way," before driving off and waiting at a nearby parking lot, court records say.

Mr. Thomas suffered pain in his left shoulder, elbow and leg and had a long "road rash" his forearm.

When police arrived to investigate and found Ms. Dolkart in a parking lot nearby, she reportedly described her actions as an attempt to let the cyclists "know I was there," according to court documents.

Reached Wednesday afternoon, Ms. Dolkart said that her attorney had instructed her not to comment about the indictment.

In December, Ms. Dolkart struck two SMU second-year law students as they crossed Hillcrest Avenue near the university campus. Ms Dolkart told police that she had not seen the pedestrians because the sun was in her eyes. A police report ruled that the sun would not have blocked her view of the pedestrians and that she had failed to check the crosswalk.

Bicycling advocates praised the indictment Wednesday and described the incident as an extreme example of what occurs daily for cyclists who share the streets with vehicles.

Brian Hasenbauer, a former professional triathlete who frequently rides around White Rock Lake, said he has survived being struck by vehicles on three occasions, as well as numerous encounters with agitated and aggressive drivers.

"Dallas is not very cycling-friendly," Mr. Hasenbauer said. "I definitely feel it is something that should be prosecuted if it's done on purpose or if it's an accident and it's done by negligence."
on Jun 12, 2005
As I said on the other blog, the place for bikes is either the road of special bike paths. A ten year old on a bike can seriously injure someone if he comes tearing down a sidewalk, and an adult is a lot worse.

Good article, MasonM
on Jun 12, 2005
Thanks Baker, and I agree. The sidewalk is no place for vehicles.
on Jun 13, 2005
Toblerone; You are exacly the type of person who shouldn't be allowed to operate a motor vehicle. To sum up your attitude "It's ok and expected to hit anyone who is moving slower".
Sorry, no.


Don't put words in my mouth, I am not saying that murdering people is okay and I resent you implying it. I'm always very cafeful with bikes on the road. I just don't see why they should have to ride in the middle of the bloody road. I'm not saying you should not watch out for cyclists. I'm saying that if cyclist are inconsiderate to drivers by riding in the middle of the road and expect them to either slow to a crawl or overtake illegally they can expect an accident to happen eventually. As a general rule you have to take into account idiots on the road, whether cyclist or driver. A lot of cyclists however seem to act like they are invincible and don't even look around to see who else is on the road. I don't think they should be allowed to ride in the MIDDLE of the road when there is enough room to ride on the side, or better yet there is a cycle lane (and when those options are unavailable they shouldn't be there). Despite my misgivings with the situation I'm alway considerate and safe, which is more than I can say for some of them. Despite not liking having to slow down and wait for a chance to get past, I'd feel much worse about killing them than I would about being late.

I should point out that I am refering to the situation in MY city, which I didn't really emphasise in my first post. Canberra in known for having very wide roads and for having cycle lanes (not footpaths, actual specialised lanes). The width of a normal road in Canberra is often the same size or bigger than a some of the main roads in Sydney, except for maybe the one that goes over the Sydney Habour Bridge. In addition to this they have emergency lanes that are wide enough and flat enough (well, usually) to ride on. Yet people still choose to ride in the middle of the bloody road.

Not all of them do that, I have no problems with people that keep nicely to the side so I can get through without having to slow down to a crawl for extended periods, change lanes or over taking illegally. I have to pay hundreds of dollars a year in registration fees for my car (that goes towards roads) the cyclist don't, I don't think a little consideration from them is asking too much.

I'm not anti-cyclist, just anti stupid inconsiderate arsehole. I am very pro building road that can accommodate both cyclists and motor vehicles users, unfortunately a lot of roads aren't suitable for shared use. I think the road builders share part of the responsibility in this problem which is partly caused by the sides of road being too uneven to ride on.
on Jun 13, 2005
#8 by Toblerone
Monday, June 13, 2005


Thanks for clarifying that. I'm sure you can understand how someone could take statements like:
when they ride on the roads they take their life in their own hands. Unless you are riding at the speed limit you should expect to get hit unless you get off the middle of the road.
A car will do a lot more damage to a bicycle than the bicycle will do to the car, so therefore the cyclists should be the ones who are careful.

to mean that you do in fact believe that the issue of safety is entirely on the cyclists and if you hit them with your car it's not your fault.

I didn't put words in your mouth, I simply took issue with the words you chose to use.
on Jun 14, 2005

#9 by MasonM
Monday, June 13, 2005





#8 by Toblerone
Monday, June 13, 2005


Thanks for clarifying that. I'm sure you can understand how someone could take statements like:
when they ride on the roads they take their life in their own hands. Unless you are riding at the speed limit you should expect to get hit unless you get off the middle of the road.
A car will do a lot more damage to a bicycle than the bicycle will do to the car, so therefore the cyclists should be the ones who are careful.

to mean that you do in fact believe that the issue of safety is entirely on the cyclists and if you hit them with your car it's not your fault.

I didn't put words in your mouth, I simply took issue with the words you chose to use.


Valid point mason. But you missed the most important part:


when they ride on the roads they take their life in their own hands. Unless you are riding at the speed limit you should expect to get hit unless you get off the middle of the road.
on Jun 14, 2005
No I didn't miss it at all. I simply selected the section I found questionable. You've clarified your intended meaning which wasn't very clear at all in your original post. I see no need to drag it on any further.

I can understand your frustration regarding unsafe cyclists, and I share it. While we seem to have far fewer of these types of cyclists here, they aren't non-existent. I see more of the "left side loonies" here than ones who ride in the center of the lane.

The fact is that everyone who uses the roadways, motorists and cyclists, has a responsiblity to do so as safely and responsibly as possible. This isn't an "us vs them" issue. It's an issue of public safety for everyone concerned. When someone is killed, they're just as dead regardless of who we think was right or wrong. It's doubly tragic is that someone is a child.

Whether you or anyone else thinks it's right, wrong, or a royal pain the in arse, bicycles are vehicles, and cyclists do have a legal right to use the roadway. Both motorists and cyclists need to share the road in a safe manner. Personally I'd love to live in a place that has what sounds like a lot of dedicated cycling lanes. It would be great.