A bunch of useless crap
Published on March 11, 2008 By MasonM In Current Events

The Department of Transportation is actively blacklisting news outlets that are openly and aggressively critical of the Mexican Truck Pilot Program. One such agency, OOIDA (Owner Operators Independent Drivers Association) Media which publishes Land Line Magazine, a magazine dedicated to the trucking industry, has been subjected to such blacklisting.

In August of 2007, after some articles that were highly critical of the pilot program, the DOT abruptly cut off all communication with OOIDA Media and refuses to accept or return their phone calls or emails and removed them from the press release list  in an obvious attempt to silence critics of the program.

Last year Congress cut off funding for this program in the transportation funding bill that was passed and signed into law. Transportation Secretary Mary Peters chose to ignore the will of Congress and continued the program even though the bill expressly eliminated funding for the program. She is even talking about extending it another three years.

Ms. Peters found herself in a Senate hearing today to explain her actions and was sternly warned that continuing this program against the will of Congress would have "consequences".

A reporter for World Net Daily was refused entry to this hearing today on the pretense of not having proper credentials. World Net Daily has also published several articles that were highly critical of the pilot program. The reporter states that nobody even asked to see any credentials and was simply told "We've read your stories" and was denied access to report on the hearing.

So this is what our country is becoming? If a news agency says something critical of a government pet project they are simply blacklisted and not allowed to report? I think the Constitution has something a bit different to say on this topic. What's next? Jackbooted stormtroopers kicking in the doors of bloggers who write anything negative about the government? Government censorship of the news?

This is a blatant violation of the Constitution and the people should be up in arms about it. But of course, nobody seems to actually know about it. I wonder why that is? Shouldn't the other news agencies be screaming their heads off about this? Or are they afraid that they too will become blacklisted?

 

WND Story

OOIDA Land line Story

Hearing Story


Comments
on Mar 11, 2008
They can report whatever they like, but nowhere does it say they have a right to be spoonfed information (ie receive press releases).

I'd like to see more of this. It'll force journalists to actually make contacts and break stories rather than simply regurgitating the releases they get every day. I've always been jealous of the journos who can simply take in a press conference or press release and publish on the basis of provided info.

That'd be much easier than what I've had to do in the past.
on Mar 12, 2008

You see her folly with this though.  In trying to quash news stories that make her look bad, she made herself the story.

Thanks for doing your part and bringing it to the attention of those of us who wouldn't have heard otherwise.

The internet has rendered "blacklisting" of the press a fool's tactic.

 

on Mar 12, 2008
You see her folly with this though. In trying to quash news stories that make her look bad, she made herself the story.


That's certainly true. I just sometimes wish news was more regularly more than just what government/businesses want people to know about.

on Mar 12, 2008
They can report whatever they like, but nowhere does it say they have a right to be spoonfed information (ie receive press releases).


I am getting old. I am actually agreeing with Cacto now.

But this is not an issue about freedom of the press, since they still have the freedom to publish what they want. It is about personal pique, and how even leaders can be juvenile in that regard. You do not see Helen Thomas being blackballed? So it is not all, just some petulant little pipsqueaks with illusions of importance.
on Mar 12, 2008
You see her folly with this though. In trying to quash news stories that make her look bad, she made herself the story.


Exactly. It's not a smart move, but they have been telling lie after lie with regard to this program and only a small percentage of the media has been calling them out on it. Most of the press simply don't know enough about the industry to recognize the lies for what they are so they are simply trying to silence the few who do.
on Mar 12, 2008
They can report whatever they like, but nowhere does it say they have a right to be spoonfed information (ie receive press releases).


That's true, but I think it's different when it's a government agency. They should not be permitted to blacklist any news organization because they don't like what that organization is saying about them. We the people have a right to know the truth about what the government is telling us.
on Mar 12, 2008
So it is not all, just some petulant little pipsqueaks with illusions of importance.


Do you mean the DOT or these news agencies? If the former then I agree, but it's actually more important than that. As I mentioned above it's about a government agency trying to silence the few who recognize the lies they are telling us and reporting on them.

John Hill, head of the FMCSA, actually had the nerve to tell reporters that Mexican trucks actually have a better safety record than the Americans trucks. This is a blatant falsehood as our American agencies don't have access to any Mexican safety database since none exists. It was a flat out lie and only those news agencies that know about the trucking industry spotted this and reported on it.

on Mar 12, 2008
My wife is in international customer service now, she has trucks going over the border every day... What a mess! Mexican trucks cross over with almost no problem, but if there's the slightest smudge on the paperwork of trucks going to Mexico, life as we know it ends. She's basically on call 24/7 "just in case".

"North American Free Trade Agreement" only seems to work for those headed North to America.
on Mar 12, 2008

They should not be permitted to blacklist any news organization because they don't like what that organization is saying about them. We the people have a right to know the truth about what the government is telling us.

Agreed!  

I guess the 'media' haven't reported it (aren't all over it) because they ARE afraid of the consequences!  That's not a nice thing to think about!  Hare we really gone over the edge here?  Is our government lying to us?! Duh, forget I asked that question!lol!

on Mar 12, 2008
My wife is in international customer service now, she has trucks going over the border every day... What a mess! Mexican trucks cross over with almost no problem, but if there's the slightest smudge on the paperwork of trucks going to Mexico, life as we know it ends. She's basically on call 24/7 "just in case"."North American Free Trade Agreement" only seems to work for those headed North to America.


Yeah crossing the border is Hell for American truckers.

So far NAFTA has only served to suck jobs and money out of the US.
on Mar 12, 2008
I guess the 'media' haven't reported it (aren't all over it) because they ARE afraid of the consequences!


Well, it reality it could simply be the competition between news agencies. Maybe they're ok with it as long as it isn't them. Or perhaps they are afraid of being blacklisted as well.

Is our government lying to us?! Duh, forget I asked that question!lol!


Yep, they do it every single day.
on Mar 12, 2008

I was here, read what you posted, agreed with it all!! the country has gone to hell.

on Mar 12, 2008
I was here, read what you posted, agreed with it all!! the country has gone to hell.


Glad ya stopped by.