A bunch of useless crap
Published on November 27, 2006 By MasonM In Misc
I've been surfing the net as I have a habit of doing, and came across an English Islamic forum. It makes for some interesting and somewhat educational reading. Of particular note were some of the forum rules, which I am listing here.

02- Posting in gender room by someone with a wrong or no gender icon: disable 5

03- Posting anti-Islamic link or offensive content: disable 10 + trash

05- Posting profane words: warn + edit post

06- Supporting un-Islamic Behavior: disable 10

07- Questioning rules, or mod's action, in public: disable 10
08- Oppose rule or show disrespect to an IF official: disable 10
09- protesting an action in public: repeat. If its another member: disable 10
10- Bad Usernames: report to admin to change
11- Signatures violating any of our conditions: disable 5

12- Violent or Sect related signatures: disable 5 + delete sig

13- Sect topic: multi-moderation: 'Close a Sect Topic'+(if repeated) disable 10

17- Covered faces (icon or sig): remove + warn

18- supporting any civilian killings: edit post + disable 10

22- insult Allah/Prophet/Islam/scholar/member: disable 10

24- preach another faith: warn

26- jihad or tawassul discussions: warn+edit (disable 5 if repeated)

27- posting a sect-related reply: warn+multi-mod+edit (if repeated disable 5)

29- Spamming or Missionary posting: delete + disable 10

32- posting what wrongfully gives Islam a bad name: disable 10

33- discriminating based on race, religion, nationality: warn, if repeated disable 5

34- supporting cult/sectarian ideas: disable 10

40- non-Muslims showing no interest in learning about Islam, or consistently attacking Muslims/Islam: warn within first 30 posts, disable at 50 posts

Some additional rules:

does not welcome debates with other faiths, ideologies or philosophies but rather we will inform you what Islam has to offer you. Briefly what this means is: you are not here to proselytize your belief system.

No postings of military uniforms, aircraft's, tanks, weapons of nations that has harmed Islam and are responsible for the deaths of many Muslims in their icon settings, signature or forum postings. Equally this applies to our Muslim brothers and sisters. Since our goal is to establish Islam in a peaceful manner, images as such maybe interpreted as a violent call.

Killing civilians of any race, nationality, or religion, irrespective of its cause, is absolutely prohibited in Islam. Therefore, praising the killing of any civilian, arguing in favor of, or providing any links to such arguments are strictly not allowed. Violators will be banned immediately without delay.

Supporting zionism, occupations and imperialism are not allowed.

I especially liked this one : Non-Muslims and disbelievers are welcomed to join IF, only if their intentions are to explore and learn about real Islam. We have the tools and ability to judge who's sincere, and who is an enemy of Islam.


Every forum has rules, but good grief! It looks like the folks running the forum are trying to go out of their way to put a good face on Islam for whomever might visit the site. The fact that they actually need some of these rules regarding jihad and sectarian posts really says a lot.

Comments (Page 1)
2 Pages1 2 
on Nov 27, 2006

They coulda shortened it to...."We are always right.  Come and gain wisdom from your betters.  All others need not apply."

Shesh. 

on Nov 27, 2006
*shrugs*

Like you said mason, every forum has it's rules. If you don't like it, then you don't have to post there.

I mean, it's the same thing here, DU, etc...



on Nov 27, 2006
They don't sound that extreme. I've seen the same sort of rules on other forums that are dedicated to a single purpose and have particularly hardworking moderators, from game forums to christian ones. They just write a new rule every time they get a new spammer/griefer/troll.

As for being excessively positive in their portrayal of Islam, well, why not? The forum members are there to discuss it positively. Why bother letting people troll it? It's a private site not unlike JU or DU, so why not enforce the beliefs of the site founder?
on Nov 28, 2006
Back a few years ago I tried to argue religion on a Christian site (that now I can't seem to find), and was met with EASILY as draconian a response. If you question the inerrancy of the Bible, you were being blasphemous. If you tried to expound on their misguided ideas about evolution, you were proselyting secular humanism.

I think you'll find that you could find just as draconian rules on many different forums of varying topics. You've been to DU. You can't even argue from a conservative perspective there. It isn't allowed, because the forum is FOR anti-republican dems. The only thing they really hurt is their ability to debate in the end, because their ideas are never challenged.

If they want hothouse arguments that can't survive without a jackboot moderator, great. Let the stricken deer go weep, imho. They're just ripe for the picking when they wander out.

on Nov 28, 2006
I see no problem with a forum for discussions within a group that is not open to outsiders. There are plenty of other places for debate, that just isn't one of them.
on Nov 28, 2006

They don't sound that extreme. I've seen the same sort of rules on other forums that are dedicated to a single purpose and have particularly hardworking moderators, from game forums to christian ones.

I was thinking the same thing.  Change the intent to politics and Islam to democrats, and you have democratunderground.org. 

on Nov 28, 2006

Supporting zionism, occupations and imperialism are not allowed.


I wonder if quoting the Quran is allowed.

The Quran does support Zionism, occupations, and imperialism.

on Nov 28, 2006
Reply #3
They don't sound that extreme. I've seen the same sort of rules on other forums that are dedicated to a single purpose and have particularly hardworking moderators, from game forums to christian ones. They just write a new rule every time they get a new spammer/griefer/troll.


I never said they were extreme, just that there seemed to be a lot of them. (yes, I'm bening facetious) I only posted sections of what is a long list of rules. I've read the rules pages of a lot of forums and this simply struck me as being among the most authoritarian that I had run across.

The fact that they felt the need to post more than one rule/statement regarding violence and sectarian posts is what really stood out though.

As for being excessively positive in their portrayal of Islam, well, why not? The forum members are there to discuss it positively. Why bother letting people troll it? It's a private site not unlike JU or DU, so why not enforce the beliefs of the site founder?


Actually I agree with you here. There is nothing wrong with trying to create an intelligent, positive forum. My point was that in establishing some of their rules they are in a round about way acknowledging the fact that sects and violence are a problem within Islam despite the claims of some to the contrary.

Some of their rules are indeed to deal with trolling, and I have no problem at all with that. I've seen plenty of other forums that could use better troll rules.

on Nov 28, 2006
Reply #1

They coulda shortened it to...."We are always right. Come and gain wisdom from your betters. All others need not apply."

Shesh.


on Nov 28, 2006
Reply #4
Back a few years ago I tried to argue religion on a Christian site (that now I can't seem to find), and was met with EASILY as draconian a response. If you question the inerrancy of the Bible, you were being blasphemous. If you tried to expound on their misguided ideas about evolution, you were proselyting secular humanism.


Yep, I've seen some of those. But I don't think I've ever seen one that needed to have rules against certain sects of their religion who promote violence.

on Nov 28, 2006
Reply #5
I see no problem with a forum for discussions within a group that is not open to outsiders. There are plenty of other places for debate, that just isn't one of them.
Jythier
View Jythier's Profile
Email Jythier
Find Posts By Jythier


You misunderstood something there. They are open to "outsiders" and have a statement welcoming them. Nothing in the rules I posted states that "outsiders" are unwelcome.
on Nov 28, 2006
Reply #6

They don't sound that extreme. I've seen the same sort of rules on other forums that are dedicated to a single purpose and have particularly hardworking moderators, from game forums to christian ones.

I was thinking the same thing. Change the intent to politics and Islam to democrats, and you have democratunderground.org.
Dr. Guy
View Dr. Guy's Profile
Email Dr. Guy
Find Posts By Dr. Guy


Frankly, I think DU is far less tolerant than these folks
on Nov 28, 2006
Reply #7

Supporting zionism, occupations and imperialism are not allowed.


I wonder if quoting the Quran is allowed.

The Quran does support Zionism, occupations, and imperialism.


Yeah, they do indeed quote it as well as the Torah and the Christian Bible.

While reading through some of the forum I was a bit surprised by how many Christians, Jews, and Atheists were posting members there. They definitely do not discourage people of other beliefs from posting there, asking questions, or even debating certain ideas so I have to give them that.

The Muslims on the forum are mostly living in Europe, Canada, the US, and various other mostly English speaking countries. It's a pretty good way to see just how they think as you read some of the posts. One of the things that you find is that even those who are educated and living in Western countries still agree that insulting God, Mohamed, or Islam is deserving of the death penalty under Divine Law.

on Nov 28, 2006
These rules are no worse than any other number of forums I've seen. I don't think it's because they're Islam, I think it's just that they're strict on staying on a set topic.
on Nov 28, 2006
"Yep, I've seen some of those. But I don't think I've ever seen one that needed to have rules against certain sects of their religion who promote violence."


Visited may anti-abortion sites? Get a heated discussion going about homosexuality on a Christian site and sit back and wait, as well. You'd be surprised the bent some of these Phelps-esque Christians can have.
2 Pages1 2