A bunch of useless crap
Published on September 3, 2006 By MasonM In Politics
I really hate election years. We are inundated with political campaign ads and the majority of them don't bother telling us why we should vote for the candidate the ad supports, but rather why we shouldn't vote for whomever they are running against. Mudslinging at it worst.

As I have been watching the news this morning I have seen ads for all sorts of people running for office and, with one single exception, they all spent the majority of their air time telling me why I shouldn't vote for the other person instead of why I should vote for a certain person. The one exception is a woman running for a state judicial position and her ad never even mentioned her opponent at all. It was a breath of fresh air in a cesspool of political turds.

Are the people running for political offices so lacking in charactor or original thought that the only things they can tout are the shortcomings, real or not, of their opposition? Can't they simply tell the voters why they are the better person for the job? Or is it simply that there is such little difference between the candidates on each side of the fence that a cloud of mudslinging is the only thing they can possible muster?

At this point I would gladly vote for any candidates that would run clean campaigns that refuse to resort to mudlinging, preferring instead to tell me the merits of the candidates in question. Sadly, at least in my state, no such candidates seem to exist. I really don't want to be told why I shouldn't vote for someone. I prefer for them to tell me why I should vote for them and then make up my own mind about which I think would be better for the job.

Or it that what they are afraid of? If they each tell us why we should vote for them, perhaps we'll decide that none of them are really the best people for the jobs?

Comments
on Sep 03, 2006
Quite often, when a candidate has nothing to run on; no platform, no ideas, no plan, all they are left with is to say 'vote against the other guy'.
on Sep 03, 2006
Reply #1
Quite often, when a candidate has nothing to run on; no platform, no ideas, no plan, all they are left with is to say 'vote against the other guy'.


Yeah, that was kinda my point.
on Sep 03, 2006

Although both parties do this mudslinging, the Democrats have brought it to a HIGH ART FORM.

 

When asked how they would handle ANYTHING, the war, the economy, same SEX MARRIAGE.. ANYTHING, THEY IMMEDIATLY LAUNCH INTO A TIRADE ABOUT president Bush.

on Sep 03, 2006
Reply #3

Although both parties do this mudslinging, the Democrats have brought it to a HIGH ART FORM.



When asked how they would handle ANYTHING, the war, the economy, same SEX MARRIAGE.. ANYTHING, THEY IMMEDIATLY LAUNCH INTO A TIRADE ABOUT president Bush.


Sadly, in my state, it's both sides doing it equally. I can't honestly say I'm seeing either side actually telling me why I should vote for them, only why I shouldn't vote for the other guy.
on Sep 03, 2006
Yeah...hate them...hate them so much I'll show an example:

Political Ad campaign for Politician A:

Hello, I'm Politician A and I don't eat babies. Politician B voted against welfare reform....and he never said that he didn't eat babies. It makes you think.

Vote for me, I know you don't want someone in office who eats babies.

End of example.

This may be a hyperbole, but it's not that far off from the crap they usually run...

~Zoo
on Sep 03, 2006
Reply #5
Yeah...hate them...hate them so much I'll show an example:

Political Ad campaign for Politician A:

Hello, I'm Politician A and I don't eat babies. Politician B voted against welfare reform....and he never said that he didn't eat babies. It makes you think.

Vote for me, I know you don't want someone in office who eats babies.

End of example.

This may be a hyperbole, but it's not that far off from the crap they usually run...

~Zoo


Yep, that's about it.
on Sep 03, 2006
Sadly and simply, Negative works.  Most people are not like you.  They vote AGAINST a candidate, not for one.
on Sep 03, 2006
I rarely see political ads.

Perhaps I need to up my TV viewing?

on Sep 03, 2006
Reply #7
Sadly and simply, Negative works. Most people are not like you. They vote AGAINST a candidate, not for one.


Unfortunately, that's probably true in many cases where they don't simply vote the party line (which is even more stupid IMHO)
on Sep 03, 2006
Reply #8
I rarely see political ads.

Perhaps I need to up my TV viewing?


As little tv as I watch I'm thinking more along the lines of cutting my tv viewing, at least until after the elections.
on Sep 03, 2006

I KNOW!! isn't that something?!

I turned the tv on this morning and thought I was catching the local news and it turned out to be a show where the newscaster interviews someone running for governor...I HATE politics,  it I had known....

so anyway this woman talked about what she would like to see happen in the system,  what she believes in,  what needs to be changed,  and I agreed with everything up to the part about changing the non-smoking in any building. 

She didn't slam her opponent other than to say that Gov. Pawlenty had broke his word when he stood and signed his name to the baseball stadium bill,  in which we all now will be paying for that ^&%*( stadium.....

so the ads do suck,  yes!  I just enjoyed listening to what someone wanted to do if they got elected.

on Sep 03, 2006
and I agreed with everything up to the part about changing the non-smoking in any building.


You're for or against it? I think they're getting carried away when they ban smoking from bars. Come on for crying out loud! The vast majority of those who frequent bars also smoke. This is America. If anything they should pass a law requiring them to post it on the entrance "Warning: This establishment permits smoking".

This allows the owner of the business to cater to his/her customers, and the customers to make a choice as to whether they wish to enter. What can be more fair than that? After all, they are privately owned businesses and the government really shouldn't be passing these PC bullshit laws that hurt their business (i.e. livelyhood). Those bars who don't permit smoking will attract non-smokers, and those that do will attract smokers. Everyone is happy and nobody loses business.

I guess that's too much common sense for either government or the PC Nazis.
on Sep 04, 2006
Oh wow, I'm shocked this morning. There was actually a campaign ad from a Republican congressional candidate in which the candidate actually talked about himself and why we should vote for him. He never once mentioned the Democrats or Democratic candidate in any way.