Terrorist Attack In India

Published on July 11, 2006 By MasonM In Current Events

Yes, those loveably misunderstood terrorists are at it again. This time in India. I'm sure it must be Bush's fault.
Link

Comments

Dr Guy

on Jul 11, 2006

Of course it is Bush's Fault! He made the Nuke deal, remember?

MasonM

on Jul 11, 2006

#1 by Dr. Guy
Tue, July 11, 2006 1:32 PM

[Dr. Guy]
Of course it is Bush's Fault! He made the Nuke deal, remember?

Yeah, I knew he had to be at fault in some fashion.

feisty_in_ohio

on Jul 11, 2006

Yep - Bush's fault. India let him visit their country and treated him as a head of state!

Bahu Virupaksha

on Jul 12, 2006

It was the most unfortunate event and more than 200 people have been killed. The trains are packed like sardines during the evening rush hour when terror struck. Body parts were blown away more than 100 feet and the rains made resue and relief more difficult. The hospitals were hardly equipped to handle this kind of emergency. Two Moslem terrorist groups are suspected both of whom find a place in the list of Al Qaeda affiliates released by the State Department. The purpose of the 8 serial blasts was to provoke a backlash against a section of the Indian population like what happened in 1993.

The nuclear deal had nothing to do with the attak except that it signalled India's acceptance of a place in the American banquet, something that the Opposition resents. India and the World could have done without that Nuclear deal.

The real reason for the blats lies in the poor governance of the present regime in Delhi. Though there in a Prime Minister in name, real power is in the hands of Sonia Gandhi and there is growing tes=nsion between the two. A gaggle of regional parties suppport the present government and they blackmail the Central Government with utter impunity. This has resulted in a paralysis of the governmental machinery.

The previous government had enacted alaw, like the Home Land Security Act, called Prevention of Terrorism Act accrony POTA. The bunch of disgracefuf clowns who are lording over Indioa today repealed this Act when they camer to power making it impossibble for the Police to detect and pracecute terrorism related crimes.

The Courtsd are setting a bad example by releasing the Terror suspects on the grounds that no one bears wittness against them. Unless India learns from the example of the USA and pursues Terrorism to its quarry such incidents will increase. Further, the state of Pakistan has become the preeminent patron of Terrorism in the region. In Kashmirm and in other parts of India Pakistan trained terrorists operate with full freedom because the Government and the Judicial system cannot act to protect the citizens.

Dr Guy

on Jul 12, 2006

The nuclear deal had nothing to do with the attak except that it signalled India's acceptance of a place in the American banquet, something that the Opposition resents. India and the World could have done without that Nuclear deal.

You kind of contradict yourself in that one sentence. If it had nothing to do with it, there should have been no except.

Bahu Virupaksha

on Jul 13, 2006

India and the World could have done without that Nuclear deal.

In fact I have written that the Nuclear deal could have been avoided. However thre are other factors and in a perverse way the nuclera deal may signal"growing friemdship" with the USA making India an Al Qaeda target. In that sense you may be right, but I was thinking of the politcal factors.

Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:

Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting on the forums.
Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
It's simple, and FREE!