A bunch of useless crap
A bunch of MY opinions
Published on June 12, 2004 By MasonM In Politics
WARNING: This is an article about generalities with regard to political ideologies.This article contains MY personal observations, opinions, and conclusions. It is all based solely on things I have observed personally and is not supported by sources other than my own observations (It's called thinking for yourself) It is just chock full of generalities. If that bothers you, stop here and move on to another article.


I read articles and discussions written from both left and right wing perspectives. I listen to various opinions and debates on the radio and television. I observe, listen, and draw conslusions based upon what is said and how it is presented. I prefer to form my own opinions based on verifiable facts and information instead of just "what someone else says" I should think.

If someone says something, I'll check it out and weigh it against available information and what I already know.

In observing the discussion, debates, articles, and oher communications from both sides of the political spectrum I have drawn some conclusions regarding the general styles and ideas of both sides.

Liberal: It seems to me that the bulk of the arguments from the left seem to be based heavily upon feelings and emotions. Often, the arguments lack much in the way of substance and seem to be more of a "Our way is much more humane, tolerant, fair, and enlightened than yours. We know what's best so you should think this way and do these things."

Often the "facts" presented are either flatly untrue, or more often only "half truths" taken out of context and skewed to support an argument that otherwise would be unsupportable.

The biggest thing I have noticed from the left is a venomous intolerance of opposing views. I see much more hateful diatribes spewing from the left. They claim to be standing up for tolerance and yet are extremely intolerant themselves. They employ scare tactics and misinformation and when challenged by verifiable facts fall back on emotional rhetoric and accusations ranging from racism to homophobia (totally misusing the word) to lieing about the facts which are easily verified. Sometimes it seems they are unwilling to investigate the real facts for fear of being forced to change their minds.


Conservative: The right does tend to rely more on verifyable facts upon which to base their arguments but are often guilty of ignoring the "human factor". To me, I see them more concerned about themselves than their fellow human beings.This is the impression I often get from them.

I see a far more rational argument style from the right, and a good deal more tolerance of the opposition's views. Tolerance does not equate with agreement, simply respect for the right of someone to have an opposing view. The right seems far more interested in protecting the rights of all citizens instead of just the rights of a select group, while at the same time addressing the realities of the world.

Their debating style is far less based upon emotion than it is factual information although I have seen them become enraged when faced with emotionally based arguments which can't be reasoned with.


The right appears to me to be far more supportive of the ideas of personal responsibility and self-sufficiency. The old "give a man a fish/teach a man to fish" idea.

The right seems to be much more corporately oriented and money driven. They, in my opinion, are far more likely to support the goals of the wealthy than the poor. I see them as being guilty of elitism and classism at times, seeing the poor as more of a burden than anything.

But, frankly,, the bulk of the productive work is accomlished by the right. They spend far more energy on the practical side of things than the idealistic.


All in all, I don't see either side in a very good light as I see the real, practical, and best solutions to things to be somewhere in between these two ideologies. My personal ideology lies a little right of center in a good many areas, and a little left of center in some other areas. I like to thing that on the whole I'm just about at the center.

Perhaps if people spent less time and energy worrying about "left" and "right" and just got together to hammer out real, substantial, and workable solutions to things we just might actually progress. I think a great many good solutions to problems get chucked to the wayside in the name of ideology. The left refuses to work with the right and visa versa.

Oh, and if people would just stick to the facts instead of ideological smokescreens (both sides) intended to advance their own agenda, things would move along much better.

Again, these are MY opinions and conclusions based solely on my personal observations and thinking. I am quite sure that there are plenty of anecdotal examples to contradict the things I said regarding either side but I am speaking in generalities here. I know, generalities drive some people nuts. Oh well, this is an article about generalities. And, after all, the views and opinions expressed here are solely those of the author and do not represent the views or opinions of, well, anyone else.

Comments (Page 4)
4 PagesFirst 2 3 4 
on Jun 18, 2004
From a British perspective I think you all have the whole right/left thing confused. You cannot divide politics simply by left/right because; in accurate sense left/right is a strictly economic scale. Capitalism on the right, socialism on the left. You then have to take into account another factor an authoritarian/liberal scale. You can have a left wing authoritarian, see Lenin, and you can have a right wing liberal see Milton Friedman. See http://www.politicalcompass.org/ for a better description and also a test so you can see where you are on this scale.

Now on the whole comparing the liberals with conservatives, I’ll use your idea of what liberals/conservatives are. Now living in the UK I don’t get to see everything that gets said in the US press, but I do watch quite a bit of Fox news, strictly for the amusement factor. I can tell you one thing, the right wing is much more negative and hateful than any of the mainstream political parties in Europe, in fact the BNP (British national party) who are self-confessed nationalist fascists seem quite liberal on many issues when compared with the likes of Sean Hannity. Perhaps calling them hateful is the wrong word, I think fearful is better. The philosophy of the American right is riddled with fear. Fear of Muslims, gays, feminists, secularists, Frenchmen, international law, socialism, music, computer games and their fellow countrymen. I mean why do you need a pistol in your bag at all times unless you are expecting to get attacked at any moment.

While the right in America is not fascist, it is far to the right, in the proper sense, of the most right wing parties in Europe. There seems to be an almost blind trust in capitalism, but the only reason it hasn’t collapsed in on itself is because of artificially barriers imposed by governments. The system survives because of trade barriers used by the western world to stop cheaper imports from the 3rd world. Don’t get me wrong, capitalism works pretty well for us, and as long as we keep control over it, it will stay that way, and the 3rd world will continue to suffer. I’d like to point out now that I am not a socialist; the capitalist system is the lesser of to evils. But we must remember that capitalism does not work for us, we work for capitalism, and being the least worst system does not mean that we should celebrate it, nor trust it. I heard what would have been the funniest thing ever on TV on fox a few months back. Forbes on Fox was discussing how to win over the Iraqi public, and the “experts” suggestion, make them into capitalists! I said would have been the funniest, but these people seemed to believe what they were saying. Do these people live in the real world? Do they have any idea how much the Arabic world hates America, and hates some American values? Obviously not.

Anyway I think I might have gone a bit off topic there. One final point, the right in America seems much more ready to resort to absolute moral values. This is where I feel the big distinction between liberal and conservative lies. Conservatives believe that they have a right and duty to uphold their moral values. The section of the Christian right that believes in the literal truth of the bible feels it is their duty to stop anyone from having an abortion, whether it affects them or not, because only God has the right to give/take life. They believe that homosexuality is wrong because the bible says so (though they seem to skip the parts in the bible that say it is ok to sell your daughter, and the part which says that it is a sin to eat shellfish). The liberal ideology is the opposite of this, unless what you do has a direct effect on other people you should be allowed to do it. Abortion is ok because it concerns the woman who is pregnant, the baby is not a person until it can survive without being part of the woman, homosexuality is just as legitimate as heterosexuality because it is a personal decision. The right is for big government in that it seeks to restrict the freedom of its citizens to make them conform to a government decided morality/culture. The left is also responsible for big government because it seeks to level the playing feel of the capitalist system. It tries to give equal opportunity but giving everyone something with which to build on. Whether this is successful is somewhat debatable.

So to sum up in a few words: the right is fearful, authoritarian and puritanical
The left is overly idealistic, petty and ineffectual.
A plague on both your houses!

So says an Englishman.
4 PagesFirst 2 3 4